fallguy
Boat Builder
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2016
- Messages
- 8,894
- Reaction score
- 2,075
- Location
- usa
They were built on a vac table."hulls were very light " what was the weight approximately?
Only part of the deck shoe was hand laminated.
The hull glass schedule did not meet the ISO requirement per a composites engineer and needed to be more glass forward.
The beam sockets were moulded solid frp due to their round shape and quite a bit of frp to connect them to the core bulkheads/hull as well.
The one place I had room for less weight was the tabbing could have been db and instead I used 1708 tapes. This added maybe 200 pounds per hull per my calculations. But I mentioned it to a few experts and they suggested it was much stronger done this way.
I think the hulls came in around 2000 pounds before electrical and batteries. But was I supposed to give up on remote battery switches? The real problem is too little displacement and especially forward given the less than ISO laminate for Class B vessel. And the lack of hydrostatics that included the bdeck is not on me.
Could I have made them lighter? Yes. Significantly? No. 10%? Probably, but lots of little things add up. The beaching keels were all hand laid. They have a wood shoe on the bottom that weighs about 20 pounds, but also adds displacement and messes with the flow for a semi-planing vessel. After adding the forward bow extensions, not sure they even hit the beach. But the boat rests on them on the hard. Etc.
The 28 is a much, much simpler build.