Forming large pieces of sheet metal is no easy task. Welding them is even worse.
Why are you insisting on an aluminum hull?
Personal opinion.
I've looked at 4 different materials - GRP, Steel, Aluminium, Ferrocement.
Ferrocement I've sort of discounted due to the insurance issue. There's various alternatives including carbon fibre instead of iron for the reinforcement, and it would be very strong and easy to get cement almost everywhere for repairs, but weight is the worst of all of them, so far more suited to a monohull than a multihull.
GRP shatters on an impact that would bounce off steel and dent / bounce aluminium - I'm not willing to risk that (even if I went full resin). It also has far greater maintenance costs and time requirements - I could get a world record barnacle on GRP and need to do a repair, with a metal hull I could hit the thing with a hammer to remove it (although it could also lead to rust on steel).
Both steel and aluminium are easy to access and repair. Weight between the two is very similar (stronger vs thicker) - in fact the weight is also similar for GRP too, coming within 10-20% for all of them (assuming similar structural strengths etc).
Total price is also very similar for the raw materials too (5083 aluminium against 316L stainless steel).
Stainless steel is very good, but if there's any trapped water anywhere (yes, there really shouldn't be) then it can still corrode more easily.
Both types of hull benefit from a sacrificial anode, so there's very little difference between the two in any practical terms.
My biggest decision weight turned into insurance again - aluminium leisure boats are becoming more popular, and while you need to document everything and get both inspected, I feel that sticking to something "better known" will make the entire experience "safer" (even if only in a financial sense for this one).