M
mark775
Guest
Are we going to remain on "tender design", are the aspects discussed pertinent to "tenders stowed..."? If so, I pose a question: On a tender like the ones pictured, how many black bear, small deer, injured or hypothermic passengers can you stow on one of the pictured tenders? Tendering where I need a tender with a cute one with the bow rail would be destroyed by the first four-wheeler one tried to shuttle, kedging an anchor, or weather and rocks almost immediately. In other words, we all have our specific needs in a tender and I agree with the somebody who has tried to point this out on several occasions.
To stowage, if that be where this thread returns, I have very little experience with ridged bottom inflatables so correct me if I'm wrong, but why not aluminum so you can at least bang it around a bit? Of the four inflatables I own, three are of the soft bottom variety which, granted, are not very yachty, but stow incredibly well and are more useful in surf conditions. You can remove the engine, then physically drag the thing aboard, if need be. With the chambers not inflated to "hard" level, they seem to hold the water - almost lay beneath the wind, if you will, and offer a superior shitty-water capability (17 ft Achilles soft bottoms with the thickest material available are what we used when I was skiffing for USFW). When the tendering is done for the day, you can simply tow it. When the tendering is done for a day of running, you can drag onto the back deck. When the tendering is done for a long passage, you can break it down to almost nothing and stow it. Nothing needed but cotton sash cord or motorcycle tie-downs to secure wherever you want to secure it. This fascination with RIBs dumbfounds me and takes the best aspects of an inflatable and compromises them. If acquiring a skiff for tendering, why an inflatable at all if it is going to be heavy, not as surf-able (can't be manhandled or unbeached easily) and expensive. Why ridgid bottom - so it can perform well in one scenario, that of cutting head-on into chop? Is that one aspect worth everything else about them that's a pain in the butt (that and that they store in a cradle well)? Inflatables, in general, are silly when used as most people use them. A real skiff, be it plywood, aluminum, or whatever, is lighter and more voluminous. If not diving (somebody pointed out to me that diving is nice off of inflatables), why not just install fenders on a conventional skiff? If it is going to be a yachty thing but still weigh a ton, why not a Whaler or such? A dressed up, clean Whaler looks good on a yacht and is far more comodious than any similar sized inflatable.
Probably a little big for your tenders, but if anyone is interested, I have one that was good enough for Seals (it will not be cheap and comes with two fresh 3126s and the large silly-drives which are being worked on). The jets are, as you can see, problematic.
In short, IMO, the inflatable that makes sense is the one that you can bang around and use, then sell when it gets ragged, manhandle and store easily. Then, the question of foredeck storage seems to beg the question. Water ships into an inflatable and what, compromises the mothership's stability? - Then your skiff is too big. Just cut a bigger drain hole and install bigger plugs if that is that big of a concern. I love the idea of building a new plywood skiff at every area destination - then selling or giving away. Skiffs are, in general, a PITA for the size and type of vessels you guys have. I would get a minimum inflatable soft-bottom (12-14') and build or buy a larger skiff if you are staying in a locale for a month. If you are not a world traveler, as I'm not, I'd get a bigger skiff and deck store it or drag it. If you have a use for an inflatable - SCUBA or whatever, by all means, get a larger inflatable. Don't get a 15 foot hard-bottom because you think it will be a better boat than a conventional skiff in any other way.
Nothing is classier than a perfect wooden boat. It can be feather lite, if that is in mind, and leave the engine to somebody that needs it. Here's a pretty one I found in 10 seconds of online search - A Jersey skiff, I think.
Of course, with the larger capacity of an open boat that isn't half tubes of air, filling with water while on deck is a bigger concern. I would consider building it light enough to be manhandled by available crew and stowing inverted.
I'm trying to give perspective from ONE PERSON that has spent much time around skiffs. I don't want to start anything with anybody, and don't wish to offend.
To stowage, if that be where this thread returns, I have very little experience with ridged bottom inflatables so correct me if I'm wrong, but why not aluminum so you can at least bang it around a bit? Of the four inflatables I own, three are of the soft bottom variety which, granted, are not very yachty, but stow incredibly well and are more useful in surf conditions. You can remove the engine, then physically drag the thing aboard, if need be. With the chambers not inflated to "hard" level, they seem to hold the water - almost lay beneath the wind, if you will, and offer a superior shitty-water capability (17 ft Achilles soft bottoms with the thickest material available are what we used when I was skiffing for USFW). When the tendering is done for the day, you can simply tow it. When the tendering is done for a day of running, you can drag onto the back deck. When the tendering is done for a long passage, you can break it down to almost nothing and stow it. Nothing needed but cotton sash cord or motorcycle tie-downs to secure wherever you want to secure it. This fascination with RIBs dumbfounds me and takes the best aspects of an inflatable and compromises them. If acquiring a skiff for tendering, why an inflatable at all if it is going to be heavy, not as surf-able (can't be manhandled or unbeached easily) and expensive. Why ridgid bottom - so it can perform well in one scenario, that of cutting head-on into chop? Is that one aspect worth everything else about them that's a pain in the butt (that and that they store in a cradle well)? Inflatables, in general, are silly when used as most people use them. A real skiff, be it plywood, aluminum, or whatever, is lighter and more voluminous. If not diving (somebody pointed out to me that diving is nice off of inflatables), why not just install fenders on a conventional skiff? If it is going to be a yachty thing but still weigh a ton, why not a Whaler or such? A dressed up, clean Whaler looks good on a yacht and is far more comodious than any similar sized inflatable.
Probably a little big for your tenders, but if anyone is interested, I have one that was good enough for Seals (it will not be cheap and comes with two fresh 3126s and the large silly-drives which are being worked on). The jets are, as you can see, problematic.
In short, IMO, the inflatable that makes sense is the one that you can bang around and use, then sell when it gets ragged, manhandle and store easily. Then, the question of foredeck storage seems to beg the question. Water ships into an inflatable and what, compromises the mothership's stability? - Then your skiff is too big. Just cut a bigger drain hole and install bigger plugs if that is that big of a concern. I love the idea of building a new plywood skiff at every area destination - then selling or giving away. Skiffs are, in general, a PITA for the size and type of vessels you guys have. I would get a minimum inflatable soft-bottom (12-14') and build or buy a larger skiff if you are staying in a locale for a month. If you are not a world traveler, as I'm not, I'd get a bigger skiff and deck store it or drag it. If you have a use for an inflatable - SCUBA or whatever, by all means, get a larger inflatable. Don't get a 15 foot hard-bottom because you think it will be a better boat than a conventional skiff in any other way.
Nothing is classier than a perfect wooden boat. It can be feather lite, if that is in mind, and leave the engine to somebody that needs it. Here's a pretty one I found in 10 seconds of online search - A Jersey skiff, I think.
Of course, with the larger capacity of an open boat that isn't half tubes of air, filling with water while on deck is a bigger concern. I would consider building it light enough to be manhandled by available crew and stowing inverted.
I'm trying to give perspective from ONE PERSON that has spent much time around skiffs. I don't want to start anything with anybody, and don't wish to offend.
