Rhino - surfaces through curves and points

[TANSL]

He is totally unaware of the current tools of naval architecture.

 

[Ad Hoc]

made totally in Blender even the sheet metal development

Neat.

And what is the cost of this Blender?

 

[DCockey]

Blender is free, open source software. Blender can be downloaded at blender.org - Home of the Blender project - Free and Open 3D Creation Software https://www.blender.org/

 

[Ad Hoc]

Hi DC

Yes, I am aware it is free - as per their website.

The purpose of the question is that - if this software is free, claimed to be superior to Rhino (as per his postings) - yet it does not list any Shipyards/Naval architects on its website as users.... so, why is it not widely used by naval architects etc.

But you preempted that one

 

[pafurijaz]

Hi DC

Yes, I am aware it is free - as per their website.

The purpose of the question is that - if this software is free, claimed to be superior to Rhino (as per his postings) - yet it does not list any Shipyards/Naval architects on its website as users.... so, why is it not widely used by naval architects etc.

But you preempted that one

Try to read


1 You all my answers are related to this question : "Incorrect claims have been made that it is difficult or impossible in Rhino to create surfaces which pass exactly through input curves or points" and this all started from here in this forum discussion.
and this post was the original

2 no one has ever said that it is superior to Rhino, Blender is used only to demonstrate that even with not purely mechanical and specific software you can create complex things, and it is useful to strengthen the argumet

3 Software is a tool that you can use to facilitate tasks if you only know how to use it and you can also use pen and paper

4 You always go to look for arguments to endorse your theses and I have tried to demonstrate with examples and you continually make a statement by telling us by trying my answers to make yourself understood.

these are the points, and it is useless to continue this discussion where you don't understand the points, I got tired of the question that seems to me to have become .... Greetings gentlemen

 

[pafurijaz]

BlenderBim
Mechanical Blender
BlenderCAD
BlenderCAM
BlenderCAM blog
laser cutting and CNC milling

these are some users not only related to the main software purposes .... Greetings gentlemen

 

[Ad Hoc]

Im sorry you feel you offended, as none intended at all, i'm just exploring your rationale behind your postings, that's all.

Try to read


1 You all my answers are related to this question : "Incorrect claims have been made that it is difficult or impossible in Rhino to create surfaces which pass exactly through input curves or points" and this all started from here in this forum discussion.
and this post was the original...

But this is not that post, that is on a different thread. This post, is about Rhino. -
Rhino - surfaces through curves and points

..2 no one has ever said that it is superior to Rhino,..

Then forgive me for asking, what does this statement suggest then:

...as I said with Rhino it is not possible to create complex surfaces with predictions because they are interpolated to give a smooth surface, ....

Seems to suggest you're stating it is inferior, yes?

3 Software is a tool that you can use to facilitate tasks if you only know how to use it and you can also use pen and paper..

Correct - which is what I have also stated. And I use the tool i require for the job.

..4 You always go to look for arguments to endorse your theses ..

Im sorry if you feel asking you questions on your postings is an argument. I'm merely seeking clarification of your comments and position.
I have no thesis or agenda in this, other than to understand your position.

In order to facilitate this understanding of your position, one must ask questions...

... it is useless to continue this discussion where you don't understand the points, ..

The only points you have made are those noted above.
Just a series of links to other software... im confused what point this is making?

Debating in another language is never easy and the nuances of the language may well lose the actual intent... as it appears so in this case.
And I'm sorry you have taken these questions negatively when none has been intended.

 

[pafurijaz]

Again ? Sorry I give up..