AndreaSaiz
New Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2026
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Madrid
Hi everyone,
I'm currently working on the hydrodynamic design of an asymmetric hard-chine planing catamaran, and I'm hitting a wall regarding the early stage resistance prediction. The operating regime is 1<Fn <1.7.
I initially reviewed the work by Ghassemzadehahrami et al. ("Development of a Mathematical Model for Performance Prediction of Planing Catamaran in Calm Water"). While their mathematical model is robust, it is strictly validated for the high-speed planing regime (Fv > 4). My design operates strictly below that threshold, putting me in the transitional/early planing regime where their formulations break down due to wave interference inside the tunnel.
I am considering adapting Savitsky's method or using Morabito's semi-planing/planing empirical formulas. However, adapting these symmetric monohull equations to an asymmetric demihull presents a severe limitation: deciding which deadrise angle to input without destroying the validity of the dynamic lift and center of pressure calculations. Averaging the deadrise seems like a massive oversimplification that ignores the asymmetric lift vectors.
My Questions:
Thanks in advance.
I'm currently working on the hydrodynamic design of an asymmetric hard-chine planing catamaran, and I'm hitting a wall regarding the early stage resistance prediction. The operating regime is 1<Fn <1.7.
I initially reviewed the work by Ghassemzadehahrami et al. ("Development of a Mathematical Model for Performance Prediction of Planing Catamaran in Calm Water"). While their mathematical model is robust, it is strictly validated for the high-speed planing regime (Fv > 4). My design operates strictly below that threshold, putting me in the transitional/early planing regime where their formulations break down due to wave interference inside the tunnel.
I am considering adapting Savitsky's method or using Morabito's semi-planing/planing empirical formulas. However, adapting these symmetric monohull equations to an asymmetric demihull presents a severe limitation: deciding which deadrise angle to input without destroying the validity of the dynamic lift and center of pressure calculations. Averaging the deadrise seems like a massive oversimplification that ignores the asymmetric lift vectors.
My Questions:
- Is there any reliable empirical or semi-empirical method (or modified Savitsky approach) specifically adapted for asymmetric planing hulls in the transitional/early planing regime (Fv < 4)?
- If I am forced to use Savitsky to estimate the bare hull resistance of a single asymmetric demihull as a baseline, what is the most scientifically sound approach to input the deadrise angle?
Thanks in advance.