Skip Johnson
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2021
- Messages
- 334
- Reaction score
- 193
- Location
- Lake Tenkiller, Ok, usa
Over the years I've designed a number of marathon racing canoes, primarily for the Texas Water Safari (TWS) , mostly 4 and 6 man craft and some solos and tandems. In the beginning it was straight Autocad with some autolisp routines and seat of the pants. Then Leo Lazauskas published Michlet/Godzilla and it turned out that I'd made some lucky guesses in those early designs ;-).
With Godzilla its relatively easy to optimise a design for minimum drag for a given displacement and speed profile. Speed profile is important because designing to a specific speed can lead to a drag curve that shoots up past the design speed. It's better to have a speed profile with a fast cruise speed (~80% of the time and a sprint speed for the other 20%).
In the last few years I've started designing some craft for the MR 340 race which is a far different environment. TWS, "worlds toughest canoe race" follows the San Marcos and Guadalupe rivers some 260 miles from San Marcos to Seadrift and is characterized by numerous portages, class 2 and 3 waters, log jambs and an open bay crossing. The MR340 runs 340 miles from Kansas City to Saint Louis on the Missouri river. No portages, log jambs or bay crossing but a wide often debris laden river with its own challenges. Little wonder that different craft have evolved.
The first boat I designed for the race was a three person craft meant to do well but not necessarily win the race. It was an outrigger and fulfilled its function. Since then I've been introduced to the pedal/paddle powered craft that have developed from some pedal/propellor craft. The pedal/paddle boats are a better match for the condition on the river. First boat of this type I was involved with was to design a new hull for a three man craft. The Kraken did well but suffered from a lack of time to train for the crew and the existing amas were suboptimal. The client wanted to switch to a two man craft and expressed a preference for a catamaran. I was very hesitant to do a catamaran believing that a catamaran would never overcome the ~41% penalty in extra wetted surface all else being equal. But when I ran the numbers through Godzilla the catamaran had a slight advantage at the required displacement and speed profile. 'Contempt prior to investigation ' strikes again. But the boat did well on two hulls and brings me to my current dilemma.
I've now designed a new solo pedal/paddle hull for the MR340 and would like to really optimize the outrigger(s). I haven't been able to get Mitchlet/Godzilla to run with extremely low volume outriggers. The best I've been able to come up with to date on my own personal paddle proa some years ago and the the first three man boat for the MR340 was to shape the outrigger like a destroyers hull as the speed length ratios are similar. I'd appreciate any recommendations for a better/different approach.
With Godzilla its relatively easy to optimise a design for minimum drag for a given displacement and speed profile. Speed profile is important because designing to a specific speed can lead to a drag curve that shoots up past the design speed. It's better to have a speed profile with a fast cruise speed (~80% of the time and a sprint speed for the other 20%).
In the last few years I've started designing some craft for the MR 340 race which is a far different environment. TWS, "worlds toughest canoe race" follows the San Marcos and Guadalupe rivers some 260 miles from San Marcos to Seadrift and is characterized by numerous portages, class 2 and 3 waters, log jambs and an open bay crossing. The MR340 runs 340 miles from Kansas City to Saint Louis on the Missouri river. No portages, log jambs or bay crossing but a wide often debris laden river with its own challenges. Little wonder that different craft have evolved.
The first boat I designed for the race was a three person craft meant to do well but not necessarily win the race. It was an outrigger and fulfilled its function. Since then I've been introduced to the pedal/paddle powered craft that have developed from some pedal/propellor craft. The pedal/paddle boats are a better match for the condition on the river. First boat of this type I was involved with was to design a new hull for a three man craft. The Kraken did well but suffered from a lack of time to train for the crew and the existing amas were suboptimal. The client wanted to switch to a two man craft and expressed a preference for a catamaran. I was very hesitant to do a catamaran believing that a catamaran would never overcome the ~41% penalty in extra wetted surface all else being equal. But when I ran the numbers through Godzilla the catamaran had a slight advantage at the required displacement and speed profile. 'Contempt prior to investigation ' strikes again. But the boat did well on two hulls and brings me to my current dilemma.
I've now designed a new solo pedal/paddle hull for the MR340 and would like to really optimize the outrigger(s). I haven't been able to get Mitchlet/Godzilla to run with extremely low volume outriggers. The best I've been able to come up with to date on my own personal paddle proa some years ago and the the first three man boat for the MR340 was to shape the outrigger like a destroyers hull as the speed length ratios are similar. I'd appreciate any recommendations for a better/different approach.
Last edited: