Stefano Dilena
Junior Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2021
- Messages
- 36
- Reaction score
- 3
- Location
- Slovenia
3d/Core materials have been discussed previously. DOWNLOADS https://3d-core.com/en/downloads.html
A direct comparison between the 3d/core XPS and standard PVC foam hasn't been done. I took my time to compare the data sheets which are presented below.
I compared the XPS product to a Divinycell H80 because of its ligthweigth at 45kg/m3, compared to 80kg/m3 of Divinycell, which by the way is the foam used in Duflex panels.
The 3d core of the panel is given by a 3d void mesh that is filled by epoxy during the infusion process, similar to PVC slotted and perforated.
https://3d-core.com/media/colrightarticle_pdf/TDS_3D_CORE_XPS_englisch.pdf
I think the results speak for themselves, highly in favour of XPS 3D core. For a similar shear strength we have 4 times compression strength.
- XPS should be cheaper than PVC ( to confirm with manufacturer quote)
- XPS is 45kg/m3 against 80kg/m3
- XPS doesn't like gasoline - to be used above waterline away from tanks
What I cannot find is the amount of resin absorbed by PVC foam during a typical infusion process.
Does anyone have that information at hand, perhaps from experience?
For XPS in Hexagon core we have 40g/m2/mm, so for a 20mm panel we should have 800g/m2 resin absorption.
Any other reason to avoid XPS over PVC?
A direct comparison between the 3d/core XPS and standard PVC foam hasn't been done. I took my time to compare the data sheets which are presented below.
I compared the XPS product to a Divinycell H80 because of its ligthweigth at 45kg/m3, compared to 80kg/m3 of Divinycell, which by the way is the foam used in Duflex panels.
The 3d core of the panel is given by a 3d void mesh that is filled by epoxy during the infusion process, similar to PVC slotted and perforated.
https://3d-core.com/media/colrightarticle_pdf/TDS_3D_CORE_XPS_englisch.pdf
I think the results speak for themselves, highly in favour of XPS 3D core. For a similar shear strength we have 4 times compression strength.
- XPS should be cheaper than PVC ( to confirm with manufacturer quote)
- XPS is 45kg/m3 against 80kg/m3
- XPS doesn't like gasoline - to be used above waterline away from tanks
What I cannot find is the amount of resin absorbed by PVC foam during a typical infusion process.
Does anyone have that information at hand, perhaps from experience?
For XPS in Hexagon core we have 40g/m2/mm, so for a 20mm panel we should have 800g/m2 resin absorption.
Any other reason to avoid XPS over PVC?